![]() |
![]() |
![]() Contextual IsomorphismsAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Neel Krishnaswami. What is the right notion of “isomorphism” between types, in a simple type theory? The conventional answer is: two terms that are inverse up to contextual equivalence. I will argue that, in the presence of effects, this is too weak. I will propose instead a notion of “contextual isomorphism” that works both for call-by-value (or value types) and for call-by-name (or computation types). In the absence of effects it is equivalent to the conventional notion. This talk is part of the Lab Lunch series. This talk is included in these lists:Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsBeverley Glover Type the title of a new list here Lab LunchOther talksProvably Convergent Plug-and-Play Quasi-Newton Methods for Imaging Inverse Problems [Friday seminar]: Irradiated brown dwarfs in the desert The percolating cluster is invisible to image recognition with deep learning Signatures of structural criticality and universality in the cellular anatomy of the brain |